coreygettys6

Monday, April 21, 2014

Summary of Knox v. SEIU

My summary of Knox v. SEIU at SCOTUSblog.com: Knox knocks unions on mid-year assessment for non-members.

28 Day Free Trial

Custom Alerts

Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/06/summary_of_knox.html

criminal law cases criminal laws criminal lawyer criminal lawyers

Posted by coreygettys6 at 12:00 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2014 (1909)
    • ►  August (220)
    • ►  July (248)
    • ►  June (241)
    • ►  May (247)
    • ▼  April (235)
      • Ohio couples challenge same-sex marriage ban
      • The Power of a Structured Settlement: A Personal S...
      • SEC Preparing To Implement Bulk of ‘Conflict Miner...
      • Evernote’s Power of Collaboration, Storage, and OC...
      • New Year’s Tech Resolutions for Practicing Attorneys
      • District Court Cites Recent “Evolution” of Rule 23...
      • Managing Overflow Work with Freelance Attorneys
      • The Ethical Implications of NSA Surveillance for L...
      • Washington In-House Legal Departments of the Year
      • New Year’s Tech Resolutions for Practicing Attorneys
      • LawBiz® Legal Pad On the Road!: Free Advertising
      • EEOC briefs on line
      • Weighing The Risks Of Warrantless Phone Searches D...
      • How Bad Ideas Grow Legs
      • Federal appeals court renews Apple patent claims a...
      • Pharma sales reps are FLSA exempt as outside sales...
      • Novartis Loses Home-State Advantage on Drugs Claim
      • THE PRACTICE: Retaliation Suits Put Firms Up Again...
      • Delaware Court of Chancery Grants Summary Judgment...
      • Funded Jobs
      • Labor Board to Rule if Football Players Can Unionize
      • Mark Woods: Super memories and a super future (Flo...
      • Summary of Knox v. SEIU
      • Kansas' Unauthorized LL.M. Program Draws ABA Censure
      • THE PRACTICE: Retaliation Suits Put Firms Up Again...
      • Washington's sexual orientation discrimination ame...
      • Cell Industry Beats Back Kill-Switch Legislation
      • Perils of Law Firms Possessing Massive Amounts of ...
      • Trial Lawyers and Structured Settlements
      • Saudi Arabia court hands down death sentences for ...
      • The Power of a Structured Settlement: A Personal S...
      • Appellate Court Issues Opinion on SEC’s Conflict M...
      • Mid-year union dues increase: Hudson notice requir...
      • Mark Woods: Super memories and a super future (Flo...
      • No You Didn’t Just Jostle Me!
      • Acrobat Tips and Tricks for Lawyers
      • It's Not Easy Being Weev (Update)
      • Sidley Austin Looks to Riverbed to Build a Broader...
      • Court Grills SEC Over Costly Conflict Minerals Rule
      • Republican Governors Association Ad Draws Rebuke f...
      • LawBiz® Legal Pad: Value Billing
      • Malpractice Suit Against Morgan Lewis Dismissed
      • You Stole What From Papa John’s?
      • So They Were Shooting A Gun In The Woods. What’s T...
      • Leading-Edge Litigation Management Decision Suppor...
      • The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Cl...
      • Medical Marijuana and Defending Workers’ Compensat...
      • Google's April Fools' prank puts Pokemon in the re...
      • Jurors’ Private Social Media Is Off Limits, ABA Te...
      • The Ethical Implications of NSA Surveillance for L...
      • The Ramifications of NSA Monitoring on Attorney-Cl...
      • Automated Document Generation: It’s Not Just for t...
      • Auto Parts Antitrust Case Produces First Civil Set...
      • Twitter: A Sleeping Discovery Giant?
      • AI: Qatar failing to protect migrant domestic work...
      • Automation or Control: Why Attorneys Must Choose
      • LawBiz® Legal Pad On the Road!: Practice Successio...
      • EA fails to become this year's worst US company (A...
      • Latest Trends in Document Review: Benchmarks, Metr...
      • Acrobat Tips and Tricks for Lawyers
      • Dry Times: How to Deal with the Impact of Californ...
      • Revenge Porn: Criminal Legislation vs. Rights and ...
      • Dubious in the First Degree
      • Workers’ Compensation Top Legal Trends
      • Obesity can be a disability, at least in Montana
      • You Stole What From Papa John’s?
      • NLRB: Firing for Facebook posting was legal
      • To Keep Business Growing, Vendors Rebrand Pot's St...
      • Straight From The Hole
      • Email Marketing for Attorneys
      • In Remembrance: Leonard M. Rosen, Co-Founder of Wa...
      • Witness for the Prosecution: Ex-Dewey Partner John...
      • Patient Safety Priority in Hospital Environments
      • LawBiz® Legal Pad On the Road!: Advertising
      • Judge upholds New York state gun law
      • Summary of Knox v. SEIU
      • Alaska high court says prisons must protect inmate...
      • Patent Law — Best Practices as Seen From the ...
      • Special Needs Trusts or Pooled Special Needs Trusts
      • You Just Locked Your Car With Your Remote, So You’...
      • Legal Moves Might Mean Fiscal Relief, And More PR ...
      • The Kindergarten Version of Information Security f...
      • LinkedIn IDs Company Accused of Creating Fake Acco...
      • Company Fights Suit by Worker Over ‘Potato Gun’ Ex...
      • Twitter: A Sleeping Discovery Giant?
      • Top Legal Stories of 2013
      • Public Speaking: Conquer Your Fears, Deliver Your ...
      • Revenge Porn: Criminal Legislation vs. Rights and ...
      • Scalia to Student: If Taxes Get Too High ‘Perhaps ...
      • Revenge Porn: Criminal Legislation vs. Rights and ...
      • Marijuana, Federal Law, and the States: The Great ...
      • Judge Denies ‘Park It Now’ Request in GM Recall
      • Living in Multiple Tech Worlds: Windows, Mac, and ...
      • John Edwards Resumes Career As Trial Attorney
      • The Legal Issues Behind Bitcoin's Rise in Value an...
      • Charley Zimmer failed at retirement -- and for tha...
      • Mark Woods: Still fighting, 150 years later (Flori...
      • Legal Ethics and Cybersecurity
      • Marijuana, Federal Law, and the States: The Great ...
      • Dubious in the First Degree
    • ►  March (247)
    • ►  February (224)
    • ►  January (247)
  • ►  2013 (2619)
    • ►  December (245)
    • ►  November (241)
    • ►  October (247)
    • ►  September (240)
    • ►  August (243)
    • ►  July (196)
    • ►  June (207)
    • ►  May (204)
    • ►  April (224)
    • ►  March (196)
    • ►  February (199)
    • ►  January (177)
  • ►  2012 (1052)
    • ►  December (144)
    • ►  November (230)
    • ►  October (244)
    • ►  September (221)
    • ►  August (76)
    • ►  July (61)
    • ►  June (59)
    • ►  May (17)

About Me

My photo
coreygettys6
View my complete profile
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.