[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday in Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that, whether a claim for attorney's fees is based upon a statute, a private contract, or both, the pendency of a ruling on an award for fees and costs does not prevent a merits judgment from becoming "final" for purposes of appeal. Before 2007, petitioners Ray Haluch Gravel Company (Haluch) entered into a collective bargaining agreement with respondents...
Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2014/01/supreme-court-rules-in-attorneys-fees-case.php
corporate law corporate lawyer criminal attorney criminal defence lawyer
No comments:
Post a Comment